Search for: "Lackey v. Lackey"
Results 21 - 40
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2018, 5:19 am
In Lackey v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
It’s an interesting issue, forever to be called a Lackey claim because of an early petitioner to raise the argument. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:41 am
It has filed a statement of interest in the Gwinnett College case of Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:01 am
From his opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:52 pm
Circuit in Cook v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm
Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times reports that this issue stems a 2001 court decision in Zadvydas v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
If they keep this up until a successor to Justice Scalia is seated, Friedrichs’s counsel may have a Lackey claim of his own. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:37 am
Texas, No. 15-797, and Buck v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 9:24 am
In Cespedes v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:13 am
Facts: This case (Sine v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
That attack is based on the Supreme Court's decision Ring v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:44 am
— Anne-Marie Slaughter (@SlaughterAM) October 17, 2015 Putin v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
Although he had exhausted his claim based on Lackey v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
What is a significant problem is that Article V provides not an iota of a clue about how an Article V convention would be organized. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:17 pm
But the unpublished Order last week in Ray Lackey Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Texas, 14-292, in presenting a so-called Lackey claim that long delay in imposing the death penalty during the pendency of appeals and collateral challenges violates the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
If anything, Justice Kennedy’s first query of the day proved the point, when he encouraged Urbanski to turn to the second question presented (which the Justices had added) on whether, on the merits, the Ninth Circuit’s de novo analysis of the harmlessness of the state trial court’s error had misapplied the Supreme Court’s standard for prejudice under Brecht v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
We depart from our usual practice of hermetically sealing new and old relists to note that Bowers’ Lackey claim got some new company this week: the newly relisted Davis v. [read post]
