Search for: "Lady v State" Results 21 - 40 of 1,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2017, 8:19 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
United States, 15-6060, the right to counsel pre-indictment case, in the morning, and United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:37 am by Hardee Bass
The post Eunice Kennedy — A most special lady appeared first on Searcy Law. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:37 am by Hardee Bass
The post Eunice Kennedy — A most special lady appeared first on Searcy Law. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 5:39 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to two Ninth Circuit cases and consolidated them: Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:54 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments (telephonically) in the consolidated cases of Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
This was a reference in particular to the infamous front page of the Daily Mail which identified the three judges who decided that the government could not trigger Article 50 (and start the Brexit clock) without the consent of Parliament (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 AKA Miller)Hale noted that Miller is not judge made law by any stretch of imagination. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 1:25 pm by Administrator
  Ivory Coast is not an ICC state party, but acceded to the authority of the court to investigate the post-election violence. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:26 pm by Christopher Mathews
Let’s just say that the Lady Gaga angle was not one I expected. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:26 am
What he did was a good thing, but The Colorado State Patrol says what he was doing before the collision was not okay. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:07 am
Lords Hope, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Brown will consider whether the condition attached to claiming a state pension credit, of the right of [...] [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:00 am by Kalvis Golde
Oklahoma and Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
The Fall 2012 issue of Law & Social Inquiry includes "The Story of the Tattooed Lady: Scandal and the Colonial State in British Burma," by Diana Kim (Ph.D. candidate, University of Chicago). [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The post Case Comment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
In July 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes) heard this appeal relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]