Search for: "Lady v. State Bar"
Results 21 - 40
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
By a slim 4:3 majority (Lady Hale and Lords Phillips and Kerr dissenting), the Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal by finding that the claims of the servicemen should not be allowed to proceed on the basis that they were time-barred. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am
Martinez was part of the legal team that represented the petitioner in the landmark case Griggs v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
In Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:31 am
Tinsley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
The leading judgment for the majority was given by Lord Sumption, with a concurring judgment delivered by Lady Hale. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:06 am
Today, by a vote of 7-2, the court held in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:27 am
Determination of the ownership of the property is likely possible without resolving religious questions.United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:57 am
If I ever buy a bar, I may well name it "Deutch's Boiler Room. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
Instead, it followed the Florida state appellate court's legal holding in Hall v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:23 pm
District Court, Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division.The Law Lady. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:16 am
Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:36 am
A majority of the Supreme Court (Lady Hale dissenting) dismissed the appeal. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:06 pm
The Double Quick v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
19 May 2020, 9:01 pm
On May 11, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
12 Sep 2006, 6:01 am
The federal court case citation is Henderson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
(CSIRO) v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
As demonstrated by Mamatkulov v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, DFAL’s criterion of serious irreversible harm shows some intersection with the ECtHR’s application of rule 39 relief. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 12:54 pm
Conrad v. [read post]
