Search for: "Lancaster v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2007, 1:14 pm
The case is 134 Original, New Jersey v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:11 am
School employee employed in a classified service position may not appeal adverse disciplinary decision to the Commissioner of EducationGuadagnino v Lancaster CSD, CEd 14080The Lancaster Central School District filed disciplinary charges against Anthony P. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm
(The Court of Appeal holds they can't.)The one thing I can say, however, is that it seems to me like the state Public Utilities Commission should darn sure take a position on this stuff. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:11 pm
At issue in the case of Metrish v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:51 pm
Lancaster, Jr., of Portland, Maine, as the special master to review and propose a ruling to the Court in an original case, Florida v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:59 pm
Hall v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:30 pm
In Stoltzfus v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:15 am
In the case, Scottsdale Insurance Company v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:01 am
In Metrish v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:54 am
The post Water-rights dispute <em>Florida v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:24 pm
This overturned the previous rule from Quill Corp. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 10:47 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 5:10 am
S.L. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 5:06 pm
According to the Center for Reproductive Rights, 14 states have effectively outlawed abortion since the US Supreme Court released its 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:43 am
However, the 4th DCA, when faced with the same issue in Lancaster v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 10:02 am
Lancaster, in Clark v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:31 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:48 pm
It's also worth noting that Lancaster's complaint against Seyfarth does not delve into the merits of Blanks v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 1:12 pm
The defendant relied on the case of Padilla v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:23 am
Sherwood v Town of Lancaster In this Article 78 case, the petitioner sought to appeal the Supreme Court ruling that he was ineligible to receive credit for unused vacation and sick leave accrued as of the date of his retirement. [read post]
