Search for: "Lando v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Joseph Simone; Island Capital Management, Inc., Joseph Lando; Joseph Caracciolo; Alfred Varricchio; Anthony Pianelli; Jill Pianelli; JAP JAP Enterprises, LLC; Brian Fabrizzi; Donald Sorrentino; Anthony Carannante, individually and d/b/a A&C Management; Steven Daronzio, individually and d/b/a/ A&C Management; Rochelle Roman; Shaun Sarnicola; Anthony Tanico; Andrea Lando-Tanico; AJT Ltd; AJGT Ltd.; Michael McCormack; Donna Centola; DMAC Services, Inc.; Andrew … [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:36 pm by Giorgio Buono
Here’s the programme (available for download on the registration page): Wednesday, 9 May 2012 (Venue: “Roma Tre” University - Aula Magna Rettorato, Via Ostiense 159) Registration (16,00-16,30) Opening session (16,30 – 16,45) Guido Fabiani, Rector, “Roma Tre” University Savino Mazzamuto, Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice, “Roma Tre” University The Europeanisation of private law: problems and perspectives (16,45-18,30)… [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 172 (1979) (quoting Gertz); Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 172 (1979) (quoting Gertz); Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:28 pm
"* The decision indicates that DOI was investigating the content of Parkhouse's statement at the hearing, alleged to constitute an “inaccurate reading of the Borough President's letter,” and quoting from Herbert v Lando, 441 US 153, states that the “spreading false information in and of itself carries no First Amendment credentials … as there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact…. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:01 am by John L. Welch
We all know that the CAFC in In re Bose Corporation jettisoned the TTAB's "knew or should have known" standard for fraud set out in Medinol v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:13 am
"* The decision indicates that DOI was investigating the content of Parkhouse's statement at the hearing, alleged to constitute an "inaccurate reading of the Borough President's letter," and quoting from Herbert v Lando, 441 US 153, states that the "spreading false information in and of itself carries no First Amendment credentials … as there is no constitutional value in false statements of… [read post]