Search for: "Lane v. Franks"
Results 21 - 40
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
Frank Bowman is the Floyd R. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:56 am
District Court for the Northern District of California decision to issue a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Part I, we will address the recent per curiam opinion in Frank v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:19 am
(Lucas v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
The case underlines the dangers of complacency and the importance of evidence, even when the point in dispute (has the mark BIG MAC been used for hamburgers) appears a simple one.Contribution to the Art Award – Frank Industries v Nike – Frank Industries’ brave fight against the bigger and badder Nike in securing an interim injunction over Nike’s use of LNDR (and then following up with a win at trial a short while later) won this award.Case of the… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 6:17 am
See Frank v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:03 am
As Judge Frank Easterbook of the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Frank v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Supreme Court granted the objectors' cert. petition in Frank v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Supreme Court granted the objectors' cert. petition in Frank v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:25 am
Instead, Judge Ebel would apply clearly established general principles derived from Supreme Court precedent—from Lane v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
” At the Competitive Enterprise Institute blog, Frank Bedarz discusses the institute’s cert petition in Frank v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
The author urges that the other circuits follow the Second Circuit in Madden v Midland because the Dodd-Frank was not made retroactive and therefore provides no relief against predatory lending abuses that occurred prior to the law's effectiveness date.Madden v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
The author urges that the other circuits follow the Second Circuit in Madden v Midland because the Dodd-Frank was not made retroactive and therefore provides no relief against predatory lending abuses that occurred prior to the law's effectiveness date. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm
§ 3347(a)(1)(B)—which is exactly what the Dodd-Frank Act does.The President’s interpretation of the FVRA runs contrary to Dodd-Frank’s later-enacted, more specific, and mandatory text. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm
§ 3347(a)(1)(B)—which is exactly what the Dodd-Frank Act does.The President’s interpretation of the FVRA runs contrary to Dodd-Frank’s later-enacted, more specific, and mandatory text. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 5:47 am
The Supreme Court later held in Lane v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am
Judicial Opinions • Frank H. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:45 am
Nothing changed after Lane v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:16 am
Posted by Lane T. [read post]
