Search for: "Laurent v. Laurent" Results 21 - 40 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2012, 11:18 am by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: US: 2nd Circuit rules that color can serve as a trademark in the fashion industry, but limits scope of mark for red-soled shoes: Louboutin v Yves Saint Laurent (IP Spotlight) (IPKat) (PHOSITA) [...] [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 11:22 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Torts Emotional distress Crystal Ulrich appeals from a summary judgment decision that dismissed her multiclaim lawsuit against a funeral home, a casket manufacturer, a casket distributor and their insurers. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:29 am by Philippe Laurent
by Philippe Laurent The CJEU’s ruling in the Scarlet v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:41 am
An article authored by Barron Adler partners Nick Laurent and Chris Oddo was published this week in the latest edition of the St. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:46 am
Laurent Gouiffès & Melissa Ordonez, Jurisdiction and admissibility: are we any closer to a line in the sand? [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:59 am by Ray Dowd
Christian Louboutin's Distinctive Red OutersolesIn Christian Louboutin SA v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:05 pm by Emmanuel Barthe
Ayant vécu quatre ans dans l'un des quartiers les plus "chauds" de Paris, j'ai eu envie de creuser. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:19 pm by Armand Grinstajn
I owe the knowledge of this decision to Laurent Teyssèdre, who has discussed it on his blog (in French). [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm by Philippe Laurent
by Philippe Laurent On 19 November 1992, the European Council adopted the Directive 92/100/EEC on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property (now replaced by Directive 2006/115/EC), which provides an exclusive right to authorize or prohibit the rental and lending of originals and copies of copyrighted works. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
But the district court's holding that a single color can never serve as a trademark in the fashion industry is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]