Search for: "Lawyers' Committee v. Garland"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm
Senate refused to give Merrick Garland a hearing. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
The loosening of campaign finance regulation began with the Supreme Court’s controversial 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
Steven Garland (Smart & Biggar, Canada and Chair of the AIPPI Standing Committee on Privilege), who moderated the workshop, launched the debate by highlighting the fact that this lack of harmonisation often led to conflicts in cross-border scenarios, where even though the communication might have been considered privileged in the jurisdiction where it was created, it might not be considered privileged in the jurisdiction where the litigation is taking place. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
But none had a higher profile than her decision in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
– Natalie Orpett, Executive Editor The Jan. 6 Criminal Prosecutions As 2022 began, many wondered—including us—if Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Justice Department was taking the Capitol insurrection cases seriously enough and if his investigation would, as Garland promised on Jan. 5 of this year, truly reach those “at any level, whether they were present that day or were otherwise criminally responsible. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
And it brought together some 30-plus organizations — including Alpha Kappa Alpha, the American Jewish Committee, the YWCA, and the National Lawyers Guild — to ruminate on race. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm
Garland. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
The Special Counsel is a great lawyer and a genuine patriot, but he unfortunately fell short in several respects. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 4:49 am
” In the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen takes a look at McLane v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 6:22 am
NLRB and Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
., a lawyer and former assistant secretary of commerce for aeronautics (the U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:37 am
An excerpt from Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am
Breyer’s experience as General Counsel of the Senate Judiciary Committee, under Ted Kennedy, was important in understanding his overall jurisprudence. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
Tompkins and Miranda v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Tompkins and Miranda v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
That includes United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
Although President Barack Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland in March 2016 to take Scalia’s place, Garland’s nomination went nowhere, and Neil Gorsuch, a judge on the U.S. [read post]
