Search for: "Leathers v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm
United States. [read post]
27 May 2015, 4:25 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
The latter is an issue that two automotive industry bodies have raised in a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.For a list of previous posts on amicus curiae briefs in FTC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Cohen V. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 6:55 pm
Although this action was brought after the Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Dressed in brown leather aviator jacket, gold chain, hair down to shoulders United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
In other words, if antitrust is indeed the “magna carta” of American free enterprise (see United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm
Australian Leather was unable to show that “ugg” is, or ever has been, generic among footwear consumers in the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:46 pm
rejected Plaintiffs' argument that an antitrust stalwart, United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:49 am
Defendants are not professionals as required for a claim for professional malpractice (see Chase Scientific Research v NIA Group, 96 NY2d 20, 28 [2001]; Starr v Fuoco Group LLP, 137 AD3d 634, 634 [1st Dept 2016]; Leather v United States Trust Co. of N. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:23 pm
United States.Just by way of example, consider leather gloves. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 12:07 am
Licensing Corporation v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:17 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office does not register trademarks it considers aesthetically functional. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:53 pm
Australian Leather did not produce any evidence showing that consumers in the United States who knew of the Australian usage of the term would be misled into thinking that there was only one brand of sheepskin boots available. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
PSKS, Inc.) and, of course, campaign finance (Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 9:40 am
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) is the primary code-book that includes thousands of classifications and a tariff rate (typically ad valorem). [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:54 pm
In Leather, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 8:39 am
United States, 524 U. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:10 am
Erwin Griswold, Law and Lawyers in the United States, 65 (Cambridge, Harv. [read post]
