Search for: "Leathers v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2021, 9:40 am
United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:33 am
” Similarly, in Germany in Nokia v Daimler, the Mannheim court stated that the “royalty provided in [Daimler’s] counter-offer is not reasonable, as the reference value used in the top-down approach in the form of the average purchase price of [TCUs] is unsuitable. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:48 am
VA 1-987-746 and the United States Trademark Registrations below (collectively “Harley’s Intellectual Property”). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
The latter is an issue that two automotive industry bodies have raised in a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.For a list of previous posts on amicus curiae briefs in FTC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
During the investigation that followed, Beernsten described her attacker as a white male, approximately 5′6′′, stocky, with brown eyes and long sandy hair, and dressed in a black leather jacket. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
United States, 245 F.3d 1161, 1166 (10th Cir. 2001) (reaching the same result). [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
These philosophies also found their way into the controversial 2010 SCOTUS decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:53 pm
Australian Leather did not produce any evidence showing that consumers in the United States who knew of the Australian usage of the term would be misled into thinking that there was only one brand of sheepskin boots available. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm
Australian Leather was unable to show that “ugg” is, or ever has been, generic among footwear consumers in the United States. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:15 am
(antitrust) and United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:49 am
Defendants are not professionals as required for a claim for professional malpractice (see Chase Scientific Research v NIA Group, 96 NY2d 20, 28 [2001]; Starr v Fuoco Group LLP, 137 AD3d 634, 634 [1st Dept 2016]; Leather v United States Trust Co. of N. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:02 am
Oregon Brewing Company, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, No. 16-3602, 27 July 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
PSKS, Inc.) and, of course, campaign finance (Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
United States (1962). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:32 pm
(U.S.S.C., May 14, 2018, United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 1:39 pm
The United States Patent & Trademark Office (the “USPTO”) will typically accept this statement without question. [read post]
