Search for: "Lee v. Griffith" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Evan Lee previews United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there was a hearing of preliminary issues before Griffiths J in the case of Alam v Guardian News & Media Limited KB-2023-000955. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Oliver v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 583 Lee J awarded $100,000 to an English tourist who was cleared of assaulting Australia’s former Rugby Sevens Captian. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:18 pm
Christopher Jensen, Baltimore/Washington DC, Senior Vice President at Hudson Legal, (@thelongball24)Bob Ambrogi, Rockpot, MA, lawyer, writer and media consultant, (@bobambrogi)Lindsay Griffith, Barnegat, NJ, Director of Network Development for International Lawyers Network,@LindsayGriffith)Roy Mura, Buffalo, NY, insurance coverage and fraud lawyer, (@royamura)Sami Hero, New Jersey, VP Open Web at LexisNexis, (@samihero)Cristoph Schmaltz, NYC, Social Software Consultant at Headshift,… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am by INFORRM
Haan, Washington and Lee University – School of Law. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On 1 November 2023, the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed the claimant’s defamation claim in Lee v Black, 2023 BCSC 1920 as being without any basis in fact. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
Canada On 29 November 2022, judgement was handed down in Kaur v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
On 26 July 2022, there were hearings in Dyson v MGN Limited before Nicklin J and Smith -v- Baker and another before Griffiths J. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]