Search for: "Lenovo" Results 21 - 40 of 591
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2023, 2:02 am by Nellie Wartoft, Tigerhall
The 2005 global merger between Chinese and U.S. tech giants Lenovo and IBM was no simple matter. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:06 pm by Benjamin Goh
Henry Yang followed up on his previous reporting on the Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND judgment of the High Court of England and Wales, and analysed in detail the first part (of three) of the judgement regarding comparable licenses and determination of a FRAND rate. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:20 pm by Eileen McDermott
The UK High Court today issued an Approved Judgment in Interdigital Technology Corporation & Ors v Lenovo Group Ltd [2023] EWHC 1578 (Pat). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:20 pm by Eileen McDermott
The UK High Court today issued an Approved Judgment in Interdigital Technology Corporation & Ors v Lenovo Group Ltd [2023] EWHC 1578 (Pat). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am by Florian Mueller
According to Lenovo's press release, the actual decision should become available later, and the court declared Lenovo "undoubtedly the overall winner," a finding that entitles Lenovo to recovery of the bulk of its litigation costs. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 9:26 am by Chiara Gallo
To read the Opinion, here.AIPPI FRAND Rapid(ish) Response - 28 June at 6:00PMThis coming Wednesday, AIPPI UK is hosting a Rapid Response on the IDC v Lenovo and Optis v Apple FRAND decisions of Mr Justice Mellor and Mr Justice Marcus Smith, respectively. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 2:49 am by Henry P Yang
The Lenovo/Meyer approach to unpacking and comparison Mr Meyer, the accounting expert on behalf of Lenovo, first derived both past and future rates and an overall blended rate blending past future, from each Patent Licence Agreement (‘PLA’). [read post]
The judgment is also interesting because it is the first time the court has really focused on the question of interest on past licensing fees (interest on past licensing fees is in issue in InterDigital v Lenovo, but the question of whether it is payable and in what amount was adjourned to a later hearing). [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm by Florian Mueller
Lenovo, it took Justice Mellor similarly long as those FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) rate-setting cases are incredibly labor-intensive for the courts adjudicating them. [read post]
3 May 2023, 10:30 pm by Keith Mallinson
The recent InterDigital v Lenovo Judgment in the UK “f[ound] no value in InterDigital’s Top-Down cross-check in any of its guises”, despite huge amounts of expert work. [read post]
The European Commission’s recently leaked Proposal for a Regulation on standard-essential patents (SEPs), summarized here by Enrico Bonadio and Dyuti Pandya, establishes a framework for transparent SEP licensing. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 5:53 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  In Astellas v Teva/Sandoz, Anna Edwards-Stuart took to her feet during trial, as well as Sarah Love for Apple in IDG v Lenovo. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 12:01 pm by Henry P Yang
As mentioned, in the UK Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND decision, smaller implementers with little negotiation power may accept whatever the patentee proposes. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:56 am by Florian Mueller
Lenovo FRAND judgment (which was a much better outcome for the defendant than for the plaintiff) acknowledged in para. 168 that it's neither fair nor feasible: "For my part, I do not see how one can eliminate or distinguish the value of an invention being incorporated into a standard from the invention itself. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 1:02 am by Florian Mueller
The European Commission's leaked draft regulation on standard-essential patents (SEPs) (initial reaction, table of contents and synopsis) is one-sided (as its thrust is an attempt to devalue SEPs), but if it got enacted in this form, it would nonetheless represent a double-edged sword. [read post]