Search for: "Lens.com"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2015, 3:01 am
" The Board concluded that all three Lens.com factors support the refusal. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 7:33 am
Lens.com, 722 F.3d at 1245. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 8:30 am
Lens.com: Lens.com made $20 of profit from competitive keyword ads. 1-800 Contacts unsuccessfully tried to hold Lens.com responsible for affiliate ad buys which generated about 1,800 clicks, which under the most favorable computations were worth about $40,000. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
Lens.com, Inc., 722 F.3d 1229 (10th Cir.2013); Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:38 am
Lens.com, Inc., 722 F.3d 1229 (10th Cir. 2013) and Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Plenary Session: Measuring Consumer Confusion in Trademark InfringementFacilitator: Barton Beebe (NYU) Lanham Act: confusion is vaguely defined. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Lens.com ruling, we may never see another successful initial interest confusion-keyword advertising case again. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:02 am
”” Lens.com, 686 F.3d at 1378. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:05 am
Lens.com, Inc. case out of the District of Utah, wrote this: [1-800 Contacts] flip-flopped on the Utah legislature’s efforts to ban keyword advertising, helping to kibosh the first law and then trying to sneak in a second law that favored their interests–aided by the fact that their in-house lobbyist is also a legislator and voted in favor of the bill her employer advocated. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:33 am
Lens.com, the financial futility of keyword litigation, and Tre Milano. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
When 1-800 found that several searches generated paid ads for Lens.com's websites, it concluded that Lens.com had reserved the mark as a keyword. 1-800 sued Lens.com for service-mark infringement. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Lens.com and its affiliates had purchased adwords for "1-800 contact lenses" and variations on a theme. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:06 am
Lens.com, Inc., 2013 WL 3665627 (10th Cir. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:10 am
Lens.com, Inc., 2013 WL 3665627 (10th Cir. [read post]
20 May 2013, 10:07 am
Lens.com (2010); Montana Camo v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:04 am
See Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc. , 103 USPQ2d at 1676." [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 11:30 am
The case cite is Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., Case No. 2011-1258 (Fed. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:37 am
On August 3, 2012, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in the case Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:37 am
Lens.com appealed via the Federal Circuit. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:35 am
Lens.com’s customers utilize the website (and thereby the software associated therewith) to avail themselves of Lens.com’s services. [read post]
