Search for: "Lewis B. Campbell"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm
However, Teleflex argued that the Third Circuit erred in: a) affirming the trial court’ finding of liability for punitive damages despite a lack of evidence of reckless, wanton, or callous conduct; and b) affirming the amount of punitive damages awarded, which Teleflex argued was grossly excessive as a matter of federal maritime and constitutional law.[3] a) Availability of Punitive Damages It is well-settled in Louisiana that punitive damages are available only where authorized… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm
However, Teleflex argued that the Third Circuit erred in: a) affirming the trial court’ finding of liability for punitive damages despite a lack of evidence of reckless, wanton, or callous conduct; and b) affirming the amount of punitive damages awarded, which Teleflex argued was grossly excessive as a matter of federal maritime and constitutional law.[3] a) Availability of Punitive Damages It is well-settled in Louisiana that punitive damages are available only where authorized… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm
However, Teleflex argued that the Third Circuit erred in: a) affirming the trial court’ finding of liability for punitive damages despite a lack of evidence of reckless, wanton, or callous conduct; and b) affirming the amount of punitive damages awarded, which Teleflex argued was grossly excessive as a matter of federal maritime and constitutional law.[3] a) Availability of Punitive Damages It is well-settled in Louisiana that punitive damages are available only where authorized… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:03 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Tony Yang, George Washington University, Vaccine Sentiment and the Outcomes of Legislative Bills B. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:05 am
” 5Neil Netanel, Making Sense of Fair Use, 15 Lewis & Clark L. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 11:52 pm
B. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:13 pm
Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition (beat 15 in prelims, beat 16 teams at advanced rounds = 31 points [regionals don't count b/c too small]) · Evans Constitutional Law Competition (semifinalist out of 34 teams = 30 points) · Tulane Mardi Gras Invitational Sports Law Competition (winner out of 32 teams = 31 points) 171 Washington University moot court (2nd) · Philip C. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Schwinn Constitutional Law Prof Blog John Marshall M Colin Miller Feminist Law Professors & Evidence Prof Blog John Marshall M Mark Wojcik International Law Prof Blog & Legal Writing Prof Blog John Marshall M Corey Rayburn Young Sex Crimes John Marshall M Alberto Bernabe Professional Responsibility Blog; Torts Blog Iowa M Jason Rantanen Patently O Kentucky M Stephen Clowney Property Prof Blog Lewis… [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
– Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
B. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Lewis, of Hamberger & Weiss LLP. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 12:55 pm
Campbell, D.W. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:39 am
(Part Two) – http://tinyurl.com/3msncq9 (Ralph Losey) Court Denies Motion to Exclude Inadvertently Produced Email, Rejects Argument that 26(b)(5)(B) Request for the Email’s Return Satisfied FRE 502(b)(3) Obligation – http://tinyurl.com/3d3r6zl (K&L Gates) Courts Embrace Sua Sponte Imposition of Rule 502 Clawback Provisions - http://tinyurl.com/3pp2jlc (Stephen Finley) Digging Out of theeDiscovery Morass One Idea at a Time –… [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
Wagner National Labor & Employment Moot Court Competition (New York City)(winner out of 42 teams = 41 points) Pepperdine Entertainment (winner out of 24 teams = 23 points) 91 Texas Wesleyan moot court (10th) ABA National Appellate Advocacy Competition (beat 32 at regional = 32 points) San Diego Crim Pro (semifinalist out of 41 teams = 37 points) Pepperdine Entertainment (finalist out of 24 teams = 22 points) 86 American moot court (11th) ABA National Appellate Advocacy Competition (one… [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:16 pm
Meriwether Lewis bought a Pennsylvania model, and carried on the Lewis and Clark Expedition. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Army Corps of EngineersDocket: 10-1059Issue(s): The court of appeals held in this case that land transfers by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to the State of South Dakota pursuant to the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 did not violate §§ 605(b)(3) and (c)(1)(B) of that Act because they did not include lands within the “external boundaries” of the Yankton Sioux Reservation. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
B. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 2:57 am
Jeremy B. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
The following short statement was written by Prof. [read post]
