Search for: "Lewis v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Superior Court (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 25, and Brinkley v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 12:15 am
As I noted yesterday, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis has found California's female director quota law, SB 826, to violate the Equal Protection clause of the California Constitution (A person may not be . . . denied equal protection of the law"). [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 2:39 am by Eric S. Solotoff
On July 26, 2010, an equally divided New Jersey Supreme Court refused to hear an attack on civil union statute in a motion filed in the Lewis v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am by Liz Dunshee
Here’s the intro from this Allen Matkins blog: California Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued her ruling on September 28th on the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment in Crest v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 10:31 am by Mark Walsh
Superior Court of California (about personal jurisdiction). [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 6:09 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Superior Court’s Complex Commercial Litigation Division recently addressed what expert fees and trial technology costs can be recovered by the prevailing party in NewWave Telecom and Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 12:15 am
Earlier this year, the trial of one of the challenges to SB 826, California's female director quota law, concluded but Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis has yet to release her decision. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” I am happy to report that the most significant post-Rucho ruling by a state court has done just that.On September 3, a three-judge state North Carolina Superior Court panel ruled, in Common Cause v. [read post]