Search for: "Lexmark" Results 21 - 40 of 688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2017, 6:15 am by Robert Stoll
The post Questions Raised by the Lexmark Decision appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Lexmark's Reply Brief, to finish out the set. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:04 pm by Patent Docs
Lexmark International, Inc., unsurprisingly reversing the Federal Circuit regarding the metes and bounds of the patent exhaustion doctrine. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  When the case was filed, it was DOA on standing, but Lexmark might’ve revived it. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 2:15 am by Jacob Kramer
Without post-sale patent rights, Lexmark and others will need to... [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 10:34 am
And Reuters reports that "Printer maker Lexmark wins patent case against cartridge reseller. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sept. 30, 2019)Brief but very clear statement: after Lexmark, business customers can’t bring Lanham Act claims. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Two recent Supreme Court decisions interpreting the Lanham Act will provide companies with more flexibility in policing their competitor’s product claims.The Supreme Court recently issued Lanham Act opinions in Lexmark International v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Scholtes, The Lexmark Test for False Advertising Standing: When Two Prongs Don’t Make a Right, 30 Berkeley Tech. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 1:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Static Control Components, Inc.Tuesday, December 3, 20134:00pm - 5:30pmReception to follow Room 603American University, Washington College of Law4801 Massachusetts Ave NW Washington DC 20016  For Registration, CLE info & Webcast (live and archived):http://www.pijip.org/lexmark/Issue: Whether the appropriate analytic framework for determining a party's standing to maintain an action for false advertising under the Lanham Act is (1) the factors set forth… [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:37 pm
Coming today to Answers to Questions: Neal Rogers shares how his firm uses their Lexmark X9350 all-in-one for wireless network scanning, Caren Schwartz reviews Time Matters and PCLaw, Mark Manoukian reviews ABBYY FineReader Pro for OCR, Carolyn Thornlow explains how to create Tables of Authorities and Contents in WordPerfect, and Daniel Fennick reviews Pathagoras for document assembly. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:37 pm
Coming today to Answers to Questions: Neal Rogers shares how his firm uses their Lexmark X9350 all-in-one for wireless network scanning, Caren Schwartz reviews Time Matters and PCLaw, Mark Manoukian reviews ABBYY FineReader Pro for OCR, Carolyn Thornlow explains how to create Tables of Authorities and Contents in WordPerfect, and Daniel Fennick reviews Pathagoras for document assembly. [read post]