Search for: "Like v. Bureau of Prisons"
Results 21 - 40
of 448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2013, 2:40 pm
Hayling v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:35 am
Plus, the guy's old now: according to the Bureau of Prisons, 69. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:59 am
[A] stay in the Bureau of Prisons of a significant length is necessary in order for him to get the Bureau of Prisons' inpatient treatment program. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 12:21 pm
USA v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 3:49 pm
There's a bit of a bright spot - a number of senators have written the Bureau of Prisons to ask them to try to stop the move. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”Some 35 years later, in Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
[A] stay in the Bureau of Prisons of a significant length is necessary in order for him to get the Bureau of Prisons’ inpatient treatment program. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:05 pm
Image from Bureau of Prisons' website. [read post]
19 May 2006, 7:08 am
See Fults v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 6:38 am
White v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:00 am
The detainees in Aamer v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
In Davis v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
Like this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:01 am
” Sessions was referring to 2015’s Johnson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm
Going into today’s oral argument in Bruce v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
Plata, it affirmed a decision by a three-judge district court panel ordering California officials to release state prisoners ; and in General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:15 am
So he petitioned for a release from custody, arguing that because he had not lawfully been "in custody" of the Bureau of Prisons - he was, once his conviction was overturned, presumed, like the rest of us, to be innocent of any crimes - he could not, lawfully, have been subject to the commitment proceeding for "sexually dangerous persons" in the first place. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
The Legislative Budget Board, however, proposed a number of additions to this cost, to better take into account the costs of complying with Ruiz v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 11:43 am
Cullen v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:07 am
The more ecumenical programs—like the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Life Connections program, which looks much more like an outgrowth of traditional chaplaincy programs together with visits by “spiritual guides of different faiths”—may yet turn out to be constitutional, but it’s easy to imagine that some of the more “hard-core” advocates of faith-based prisons will be disappointed at this prospect. [read post]
