Search for: "Likes v. DHL Express"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2015, 10:43 am
The IPKat has since been informed by genial fellow blogger and jolly nice fellow Gilberto Macias that, as this Kat had predicted, the Board of Appeal decision in WEBSHIPPING has been appealed, as Case T-142/15 - DHL Express (France) v OHIM - Chronopost (WEBSHIPPING). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
Richard observes that these comments are made all the more relevant by the recent Kat-rant over the pathetically short time available for consultation in Actavis v Sanofi, a reference to the CJEU in which, this Kat believes, a good case could be made out for a more generous time allowance given the political and economic significance of the case's outcome. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Consistent with its earlier ruling DHL v Chronopost (C-235/09) along with the Combit case referred to in Volume I, the CJEU churned* the issues and confirmed that, notwithstanding the unitary character of an EUTM, a mark that peacefully coexists with an EUTM in one part of the EU can still infringe that same EUTM elsewhere in the EU. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:06 pm
DHL Express, 463 F.3d 646 (7th Cir. 2006). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:07 am
Merpel keeps thinking: isn't getting a penalty payment order against a defendant who isn't in court a little like taking a penalty kick when there isn't a goalkeeper ...? [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
DHL Express (USA), Inc., 12-747. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:14 am
Back in October of last year the IPKat posted this item on the Court of Justice of the European Union reference for a preliminary ruling in the WEBSHIPPING trade mark dispute, Case C-235/09 DHL Express (France) SAS v Chronopost SA. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
Yellow Transportation operated the facility until its merger with Roadway Express, when the two companies combined operations to form YRC Inc. in October 2008. [read post]
