Search for: "Lippman .v Lippman"
Results 21 - 40
of 214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2011, 2:29 am
Civil Service Commission v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Last year I blogged about a case (Miglino v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 12:15 am
See Lippman v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Pigott and Jones concur. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm
" Then, Chief Judge Lippman wrote that there is no material difference between the California statute struck down by the United States Supreme Court in Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]) "and our persistent felony offender sentencing statutes. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:35 am
People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:20 am
People v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 5:16 pm
In a rare 4-3 decision within the Labor Law context, the New York Court of Appeals in Affri v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:25 am
Lippman, P.J., ... [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm
With Chief Judge Lippman dissenting, the Court explained that the mandatory nature of the consecutive sentencing does not render that a direct, and not collateral consequence of the plea.That a court is not so obligated, does not mean that defense counsel has no obligation to inform his client of the mandatory consequence of his plea. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:55 am
Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, Moskowitz, ... [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:04 pm
The cases are Marvel Characters Inc v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:09 am
Smallwood v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 12:05 pm
More recently, in Lippman v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:23 am
People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:54 pm
Lippman, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Saxe, JJ. ... [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:01 am
Termination by operation of lawMaldarelli v Doherty, 7 A.D.3d 384In some instances a public officer or employee otherwise entitled to a pretermination hearing before he or she may be dismissed is automatically removed from his or her position by operation of law without being given any "notice and hearing. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:32 am
People v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:40 am
In a lengthy split decision, the New York Court of Appeals has reversed the denial of suppression where police placed a GPS tracking device called a "Q Ball" on a car in People v. [read post]
