Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED 20 May 1998" Results 21 - 40 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
The intent element may be inferred from the surrounding circumstances. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
The court further ordered that Deborah take nothing on all her claims against Robert and Bailey, incorporating its prior summary judgment orders. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Legal Beagle
The applicant filed a counter-claim alleging that the council had instructed further repairs that had damaged his property. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
  I assume Michael filed his motion under §27.003(a) of the TCPA, which states that “[i]f a legal action is based on, relates to, or is in response to a party's exercise of the right of free speech, right to petition, or right of association, that party may file a motion to dismiss the legal action. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Aaron
The Court remanded to the district court for a review of Mr. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Chapter 1 of Part XI of the Constitution describes the manner of exercise of these powers and the manner of resolving problems that may arise due to overlapping legislations passed by Parliament and the State Legislatures on any of the subjects listed in the Concurrent List. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
Audit: COLA's Request for Documents: On August 3, 2000, COLA notified Miracle Star that COLA would conduct a fiscal review and provided a list of documents and records that auditors would require Miracle Star to produce. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The number of standalone state court securities suit filings even further increases the total number of securities suits filed during 2019. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The number of standalone state court securities suit filings even further increases the total number of securities suits filed during 2019. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm by MOTP
The Houston-based appellate court did what it did based on absence of evidence of a valid acceleration of maturity of the loans--each with a 20-year amortization period.* Nat'l Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-2 v. [read post]