Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED 20 May 1998"
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
-Corpus Christi, May 19, 2016, pet. filed) (mem. op.) [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am
Mr Watson advised that in the event of him receiving instructions to do so, he was willing to excise from the file certain material in order to assist the police inquiry. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Petition for review after the court of appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Opinion delivered: March 20, 2015. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Opinion delivered: March 20, 2015. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
However, the litigant filing a mandamus petition may file a motion in the court of appeals to stay the underlying order. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
However, the litigant filing a mandamus petition may file a motion in the court of appeals to stay the underlying order. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
I assume Michael filed his motion under §27.003(a) of the TCPA, which states that “[i]f a legal action is based on, relates to, or is in response to a party’s exercise of the right of free speech, right to petition, or right of association, that party may file a motion to dismiss the legal action. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
I assume Michael filed his motion under §27.003(a) of the TCPA, which states that “[i]f a legal action is based on, relates to, or is in response to a party's exercise of the right of free speech, right to petition, or right of association, that party may file a motion to dismiss the legal action. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Chapter 1 of Part XI of the Constitution describes the manner of exercise of these powers and the manner of resolving problems that may arise due to overlapping legislations passed by Parliament and the State Legislatures on any of the subjects listed in the Concurrent List. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Reg. 66378, 66383 (FDA Dec. 1, 1998). [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Both the list of posts and the posts themselves are listed in chronological order within each section of the book. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
., 20 N.Y.3d 995, 985 N.E.2d 127, 961 N.Y.S.2d 363 (2013) the Court of Appeals observed that before a party can be estopped from denying paternity or from obtaining a DNA test that may establish that he is not the child's biological parent, the court must be convinced that applying equitable estoppel is in the child's best interest (Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320 [2006]). [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
Elsevier filed a review petition to overturn the sealing order. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
On July 22, 2011, Petitioners filed a timely petition for review of the DEA action. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
On July 22, 2011, Petitioners filed a timely petition for review of the DEA action. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Thankfully, she has filed a petition for rehearing and asked the First Circuit to reverse its decision. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am
In particular, compliance with the procedure in 20 C.F.R. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:59 am
This month, a coalition that includes farmers, environmentalists and the Center for Food Safety, filed a lawsuit against the USDA.Although Roundup Ready alfalfa was first approved in 2005 for commercial planting, a federal court decision in 2007 halted the further sale and planting of biotech alfalfa seeds until the USDA completed a statement outlining its impacts on the environment. [read post]
