Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED September 27, 2006"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
The Northwest Environmental Defense Center (“NEDC”) filed suit in September 2006 alleging that the [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
., 7 NY3d 320 [2006]). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
In a three-page order signed yesterday, Chambers granted CONSOL subsidiary Fola Coal’s request for the extension, giving the company authority to continue to operate “pending further order of the court. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 5-6 June: USFDA public meeting on evaluation of product trade names: (FDA Law Blog), 5-7 June: European research and innovation exhibition – Paris: (IPR-Helpdesk), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with… [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Tamez, 206 S.W.3d 572, 582 (Tex. 2006). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Cause No. 16-0854) and is one of two petitions for review scheduled to be heard at the University of Houston's law school on Friday, September 15, 2017. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm
Murphy could be fined $682,500 or more for the violations under federal law, and could be ordered to take actions to halt further violations. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
In June 2010, the father filed a petition for custody of the children. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
No. 30-2009-003090696)O P I N I O NOriginal proceedings; petition for a writ of mandate to challenge an order ofthe Superior Court of Orange County, David C. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
LYON: On September 4, 2015, the lawfirm defendants filed motions for rehearing and for reconsideration en banc. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
For 2013, plaintiff's adjusted gross income was $59,638 and she received a tax refund of $2,097.Plaintiff filed her chapter 7 petition on May 31, 2013. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Opinion Filed July 31, 2015. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
– Interview with CEO if Danish Radio and TV: (Innovationpartners), Bruce Everiss on video game piracy: (IPcentral.info) Events Australia: Open access and research conference – 24-25 September, Brisbane: (IP:KCE) Germany: Indo-German conference on IP law – 12-15 May, Germany: (IPR-Helpdesk), Switzerland: Workshop for mediators in IP disputes – 26-27 May, Geneva: (IPR-Helpdesk), UK: Royal Society of Chemistry: Chinese IP… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
Schwab filed a timely notice of appeal of the circuit court's Order on June 25, 2008.1 STANDARD OF REVIEW Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(d) provides that adefendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on postconviction 1 Exhibits listed in the brief are the exhibits submitted with the Motion to Vacate filed with the lower court on June20, 2008. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
From September 2004 to December 2008, Respondents demolished 146 residences. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Investigator Hall testified that he did not see a copy of the memorandum when he reviewed respondent’s personnel file in November 2021 (Tr. 90-91, 119, 121).As for the Smith and Wesson rifle, respondent acknowledged that he purchased it with his own funds, kept it at home, and did not use it for his military service (Tr. 161-62). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Investigator Hall testified that he did not see a copy of the memorandum when he reviewed respondent’s personnel file in November 2021 (Tr. 90-91, 119, 121).As for the Smith and Wesson rifle, respondent acknowledged that he purchased it with his own funds, kept it at home, and did not use it for his military service (Tr. 161-62). [read post]
