Search for: "Lithograph "
Results 21 - 40
of 221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 7:04 am
Chae's answer was in Heading 9702, covering "Original engravings, prints and lithographs. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:19 am
The main decision in this regard is Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony where the US Supreme Court confirmed that an author is “he to whom anything owes its origin; originator; maker; one who completes a work of science or literature”, which specifically can only be a human author. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:19 am
The main decision in this regard is Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony where the US Supreme Court confirmed that an author is “he to whom anything owes its origin; originator; maker; one who completes a work of science or literature”, which specifically can only be a human author. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
The USCO emphasizes that authorship has to be limited to the creations of “human authors”, according to some US case-law dating back to 1884 (Supreme Court Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:41 pm
It's a lithograph, not a chicken mosaic:The caption translates: "Yes, It Is My Deceased Wife!... [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:57 am
” For example, in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
By Atreya Mathur Credit: DALL·E 2; text prompts (left to right): painting of a robot holding justice scales; painting of a robot-artist painting flowers; painting of a robot reading a law bookWhat does it take to be an artist in the 21st century? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
By Atreya Mathur Credit: DALL·E 2; text prompts (left to right): painting of a robot holding justice scales; painting of a robot-artist painting flowers; painting of a robot reading a law bookWhat does it take to be an artist in the 21st century? [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
By James Parker The Supreme Court waited 27 years after deciding the 1994 landmark case of Cambell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
By James Parker The Supreme Court waited 27 years after deciding the 1994 landmark case of Cambell v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
A ‘work of art’ is defined in the defined in the Value Added Tax (‘VAT’) Act 1994 section 21(6) to (6B) for the purpose of section 21(5)(a) of that Act.[9] This is summarized as: – a painting, drawing, collage, decorative plaque or similar picture– an original engraving, lithograph or other print– an original sculpture or statuary– a sculpture cast– a tapestry or other hanging– a… [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 10:37 am
” The SG wanted to split the baby by allowing the Foundation to continue to display the Warhol lithographs, but not allow it to license them for use in articles about Prince, but if the creation of the lithographs was fair (or authorized) then it’s not clear why further uses would be unfair, and if the uses are unfair then why would there be a valid copyright in the lithographs under §103? [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
” Despite these shifts, everyone seemed to agree that infringement was clear: “the lithograph was so obviously nontransformative the lithographer did not even try to raise fair use. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:49 pm
Donaldson Lithographing Co., 188 U.S. 239, 251-52 (1903) (explaining that treating the reaction of the general public as dispositive would “miss some works of genius,” and also that, at the same time, “the taste of any public is not to be treated with contempt”). [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Ringgold’s activist sensibility also infiltrated her art in the form of posters such as this one, a lithograph paying homage to the inmates who died during a prison uprising at the Attica Correctional Facility in New York the year before the print’s making. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:58 am
Among the claimed intellectual property are copyrights in audio cassettes, audiovisual works, fabric designs, lithographic prints, and literary works, as well as various trademark registrations for HEAVEN’S GATE. [read post]
18 May 2022, 8:50 am
In 30 years of practice, I have on numerous occasions offered to FDA leadership the opportunity to meet directly with the people who consumed food that was tainted under the FDA’s watch. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 2:30 am
This has been supported by US Supreme Court decisions in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony and Mazer v Stein where the Supreme Court required human authorship for copyright protection. [read post]
