Search for: "Little v. United Investors Corporation"
Results 21 - 40
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2010, 6:29 am
”– Senator Charles Schumer, introducing the Shareholder Bill of Rights Act of 2009 “…among the central causes of the financial and economic crisis that the United States faces today has been a widespread failure of corporate governance. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
But first a little background. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:42 am
" Iqbal v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:03 pm
All of this is inconsistent with traditional notions of the role of law, the scope of corporate governance and the nature of corporate social responsibility int he United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:31 pm
Supreme Court in the Morrison v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:31 pm
Supreme Court in the Morrison v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 1:16 pm
Supreme Court held in Cyan v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
A. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:17 am
The recent decision of Seiden v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:53 am
United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
This symposium explores these and other issues.Keynote Lecture: James V Feinerman, Associate Dean for Transnational Programs, Co-Director, Georgetown Law Asia, and James M. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm
Ralls Corp. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 12:15 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 6:29 am
Emmerich, Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm
In Newman, however, the Second Circuit was faced with a corporate insider (an investor relations employee) who shared information with an analyst at an institutional investor. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:02 pm
Desai, Lee v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
”[3] However, the environmental concerns of local communities remain beyond the reach of international law, absent an element of global common concern, for intra-territorial environmental harms fall squarely within the sovereign jurisdiction of host states.[4] Should host states choose to listen to local community concerns and shut down corporate operations, they find themselves subject to investor-state arbitration clauses that privilege the rights of investors over… [read post]