Search for: "Lloyd v Green" Results 21 - 40 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection Mishcon de Reya’s Data Matters Blog has covered the case of Lloyd v Google commenting that the case serves as a green light for representative actions. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 9, 10 and 11 July 2019 there was a trial in the case of Boyo v Lloyds Bank Plc before Anthony Metzer QC (Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge). [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
GREEN delivered the opinion of the Court.In this case, we must decide whether a tenant can terminate a commercial lease contract for the landlord's prior material breach. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  We had a case preview from Aidan Wills and a comment on the case from Iain Wilson, Lloyd v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 2599 (QB). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the recent case of Lloyd v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 2599 (QB) (see case comment), a claim for damage under the Data Protection Act was said to arise for: (1) infringement of data protection rights; (2) the commission of the wrong itself; and (3) loss of control over personal data. [read post]
27 May 2018, 8:46 pm by Patent Docs
IAM North America editor Richard Lloyd will moderate a roundtable discussion of attorneys from Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt; Knobbe Martens; and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner to discuss the implications of the Supreme Court's decision in decisions in Oil States v Greene's Energy and SAS Institute v Iancu and how they will affect the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), inter partes review petitioners, and patent owners. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Amelia Womack, the deputy leader of the Green Party, has complained to IPSO about the front page story, along with around 300 other people. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Manager of Shine Lawyers’ Professional Negligence practice Peter Coggins has discussed the ramifications Lloyd Rayney’s case will have on defamation law in Australia, calling it a ‘defining moment for Australian defamation law. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 75 [week ending on Sunday 6 December] –  BHG on blocking injunctions | IP in Universities | Sweden on blocking injunctions | Canadian musings on patents | US Senate and trade secret reform | Chinese IP Courts | G1/14 referral and Article 108 EPC | PACE procedure (Procedure for Accelerated Conduct of Examination) ant the EPO | Greekat and trade mark partenalism | EPO Boards of Appeal tell AC: we were… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
Do the “green”, “eco”, “healthy” and “back to basics” movements ring any bell? [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73  [week ending on Sunday 22 November] –  Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles |  Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case… [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
 ****************** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 72 [week ending on Sunday 15 November] –  Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical | Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd | Economics of internet trolls | UK IPO scammer scammed | Video conferencing at the EPO | Warner-Lambert v Pfizer in France | African Ministerial Conference in IP |… [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
  * My detergent product is green, but don't tell anyoneStarting from a nice story on Eco-friendly detergents, Neil reflect over the evolution of green-branded products and their public's perception. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith, Lauren Fontana, Susannah William Pollvogt & Tanya Washington, Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Constitutional Rights of Children in Support of Petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:20 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
Lloyd Jones LJ and Irwin and Green JJ held that under s 328 of the 2002 Act it is not necessary for criminal property to exist at the moment when parties come to a prohibited arrangement, but that the arrangement must relate to property which is criminal property at the time when the fraudulently procured funds enter H’s bank account. [read post]