Search for: "London v. Social Security Administration" Results 21 - 40 of 183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by David Kris
The security officers are alert, but do not seem especially tense. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:25 am by Giles Peaker
Idolo, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Bromley (2020) EWHC 860 (Admin) I’m a bit late to this one (ironically, as it turns out), it has been an open browser tab for ages, sorry. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 9:17 am by Lev Sugarman
Circuit’s timely decision in McKeever v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
In this sense, one can understand standard setting as a mediator between the constitution of tech platforms and the objectives of national security, all within the constraints and objectives of the two greater domains of the Special Administrative Region and over all, the institutions and political-economic system of the nation. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Posted by Ilona Babenko, Arizona State University, on Sunday, August 28, 2016 Tags: Campaign finance, Congressional elections, Employees, Management, Managerial style, Political spending, Presidential elections,Social capital, Social networks Blockholders: a Survey of Theory and Evidence Posted by Alex Edmans, London Business School and Clifford G. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am by William Ford
Vance Spath placed the United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Comm Social Security     Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0356n.06 Directv Inc v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Comm Social Security     Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0356n.06 Directv Inc v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 10:48 am by Giles Peaker
Coleman v Harrow LBC, 4 May 2023, Administrative Court, London, David Pittaway KC (unreported) This was a judicial review of Harrow’s failure to secure suitable accommodation under section 193(2) of the Housing Act 1996, another example of Elkundi in action. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:07 pm by Rosalind English
Secretary of State for Home Department (Respondent) v AP (Appellant) (no 2) [2009] EWCA Civ 731 Supreme Court 23 June 2010 AP, who had been subject to a control order and who now continued to live at the same address under bail pending a deportation decision on grounds of national security, was entitled to continuing anonymity because of the risks he faced if his identity were revealed - read judgment We posted recently on a ruling by the Supreme Court that the social… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm by William Ford
Eliot Kim summarized the Second Circuit’s ruling in Linde v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Independent had a piece “ Hundreds of Android apps steal your data even if you deny permission, study reveals”. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Government has announced that legislation to place age restrictions on online pornography which was due to come into effect on 15 July 2019 now be delayed for up to 6 months after an administrative error. [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:25 pm
  Jenkins was also awarded disability benefits by the Social Security Administration. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The only available guidance derives from DPP v Collins ([2006] UKHL 40), an appeal from the Divisional Court. [read post]