Search for: "Long v. California Department Of Corrections et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
Wilhem von Leeb et al., Judgment, XI Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals 690-95, while Schlegelberger's is in the better-known Justice Case.)This may sound like ancient history, but it seems significant that in the past the U.S. threw the book at government lawyers for conduct that is awfully close to the allegations in this lawsuit.3. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm
Association of Irritated Residents, et al. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:26 pm
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
The DCO’s decision not to do so was partially based on the California Bar’s dismissal of Vaz’s complaint to it due to “insufficient evidence. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
This edition of “Petitions to Watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ “long conference,” on Monday, September 27. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm
" CBD called on Hastings to correct the information. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 7:09 am
The Second Circuit’s decision in Thomas, et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:00 am
Wilkins))))STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00531) (consolidated) LISA P. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
Dotson et al, Brand Attitudes and Search Engine Queries, 37 J. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
GONZALES, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners,v.Angel McClaryRAICH et al.No. 03-1454.Argued Nov. 29, 2004.Decided June 6, 2005. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 6:22 am
LLC et al, 2021 WL 40188 (E.D. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm
’” ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources, “Endangered Species Act,” 172 (Donald Baur et al., eds., 2nd ed. 2010) (citing National Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
In this case, the correct timing for litigation purposes would have been immediately following discovery of the loan. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
U.S.A. et al. ruled that the mosaic would not be given back because the petitioner failed to satisfy three of the five requirements of 18 U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:23 am
California Department of Corrections et. al., Case 4:03-CV-03174 (N. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
Walker In the third quarter of 2011, the California Supreme Court issued two CEQA opinions and the California Appellate Courts issued 12 CEQA opinions. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:47 am
WPG, Inc. et al, 3:15-CV-444, 2018 WL 2763453 (S.D. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
California State Lands Commission)? [read post]
