Search for: "Long v. First Union Corp. of Virginia"
Results 21 - 40
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
CBS Corp., et al., 08-653) apparently is being held until the Court rules on a pending case involving FCC’s power to regulate indecency utterances on radio and TV (FCC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a long opinion rejecting arguments made by major business trade groups that the new NLRB union election rules exceed the NLRB’s statutory authority, are arbitrary and capricious and violate employers’ rights under the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Gatke Corp., 132 Cal. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:40 pm
First Union Corp. of Virginia, 894 F. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
” The first type of reckless conduct described in §500 demonstrates a higher degree of culpability than the second on the continuum of mental states which range from specific intent to ordinary negligence. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
So long as responsible, law-abiding adults may purchase handguns in California, the First Amendment prevents the State from enforcing Section 26820’s ban on on-site handgun advertising. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:29 pm
Aramark Corp.). [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
” And in Yale Electric Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
--Elements of Law 3.0: On the Relevance of a First Year Law Course Designed to Frame the Law School Curriculum). [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 8:02 am
DeBartolo Corp. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
The challenge of the New York Shipping Association, representing many of the Ports’ employers, and several unions, representing many of the Ports’ longshoremen, was turned back by the Third Circuit. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
Detroit Board of Education should be overruled and public-sector “agency shop” arrangements invalidated under the First Amendment; and (2) whether it violates the First Amendment to require that public employees affirmatively object to subsidizing nonchargeable speech by public-sector unions, rather than requiring that employees affirmatively consent to subsidizing such speech. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:43 am
AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1312 (Fed. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm
Meanwhile, an electric utility’s appeal of a trial court ruling that the Village of Kivalina failed to allege an “occurrence” is due to be argued before the Virginia Supreme Court in early 2011 in AES Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
CITE: Agar Corp. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 8:05 am
The Supreme Court has applied it to only three statutes: § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, Avco Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
Can-Am Plumbing v. [read post]
