Search for: "Long v. State, Dept. of Human Resources"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
Alito concluded his opinion: “In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
Indeed, and slowly at first, the governance techniques of business and the state, especially in the management of economic behaviors, suggested an increasingly important space for systems of discretionary decision-making built on data-algorithm-consequence models as long as these were deployed to further the command of law and the public policies of which law was an expression.[16] It was management that counted, perhaps more than law, and institutions that served principle through… [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm
" Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
Dixon and the Cowan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 9:20 am
Alaska Oil & Gas Assn. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am
Alaska Oil & Gas Assn. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
The Final RegulationsThis past Tuesday the government published in the Federal Register a series of final rules issued a few days earlier by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Essentially, the allegations seek to impose a non-FDA-approved contraindication, using state law, based upon human genetic variability. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:48 pm
Arkansas Dept. of Human Services v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Hobby Lobby), explains how the RFRA formula relates to its prior free exercise doctrine as follows: RFRA was enacted three years after our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Hobby Lobby), explains how the RFRA formula relates to its prior free exercise doctrine as follows: RFRA was enacted three years after our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
