Search for: "Lord v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2020, 6:17 am
In Sim v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
There have been a number of County Court judgments on this issue which have not necessarily been ad idem (see eg our post on Augustin v Barnet). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
On the other hand, the Court in Dadi Jagannatha (Dadi Jagannadham v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
The Court referred to Lord Goff’s statement in Smith v Littlewoods Ltd., [1987] AC 241, that there is in general no duty imposed on a person to prevent third parties causing damage to another. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:33 am
If, however, there is some doubt about whether the actual form of compound claimed would result from the described process, it needs to be determined whether following the process would inevitably arrive at the claimed compound.This was the situation in Leo Pharma v Sandoz EWCA Civ 1188, which was decided by Lords Justice Jacob and Patten yesterday (17 November), on appeal from Floyd J's decision in the High Court earlier this year ([2009] EWHC 996 (Pat)). [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Lords), 194 Cal.App.4th 820 (Apr. 25, 2011) (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three) (reversing order permitting discovery of class list by putative class representatives who lacked standing) [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:19 am
This test was recently applied by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey in City of Newark of the County of Essex v. (148) Block 1861, Lot 24, 605-611 Central Avenue, 2010 WL 3932996 (N.J. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 3:42 am
In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court relied heavily on its judgment in Vedanta Resources PLC and Anor v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
(Gillan and Quinton v United Kingdom (2009) The search powers of security personnel at airports were qualitatively different, said the Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:48 am
The clearest statement to this effect was issued by the Ontario Superior Court in Somwar v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:37 am
In any event, the Superior Court dismissed Mr. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
The Supreme Court President Lord Philips observed that his initial inclination was to treat the new two tier tribunal system as wholly self-sufficient. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
" [FN103] FN101.See Superior Vision Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:42 am
Unlike the EPO, Lord Justice Arnold (Arnold LJ) in Sandoz v BMS considers the "plausibility" of a non-claimed technical effect under the heading of inventive step and sufficiency. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the judgment of the FCA: York University v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
It would seem “quite wrong” for this court to interpret Article 6 of the Convention as laying down an absolute exclusionary rule of evidence that goes any wider than Strasbourg has already clearly decided to be the case: this was the application of the “Ullah principle” - Lord Bingham’s well known aphorism in (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323 at para 20. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 5:39 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently decided this in Parekh et al v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:46 am
On Wednesday the Supreme Court heard arguments in Hein v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:57 am
The UK Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, with Lord Sumption writing the sole judgment, with which the rest of the Court agreed. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:18 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Dev Rai v. [read post]
