Search for: "Love v. Nixon"
Results 21 - 40
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2020, 4:45 am
I love "so precise" as a complaint. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
” In Brown, and then emphatically in Loving v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Black and Douglas were, I was certain, fighting the good fight, as clearly evidenced in the Pentagon Papers case and their opposition to Richard Nixon and his associates. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise and… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted in Biddle v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Goddamn v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm
Quoting the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm
On Saturday, January 20, 2017, Donald J. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
We know Nixon did. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm
Those of us who teach (and love) Remedies wrestle with the class every semester over how to understand the difference between a prohibitory injunction (which restrains someone from violating the law in a particular way under pain of punishment for contempt, imposed by a criminal conviction after trial), and a substantive provision of the criminal law (which restrains everyone, or some defined class of regulated persons, from violating the law, on pain of punishment imposed by a… [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am
I sometimes show short movie clips at the start of lecture classes too- I have shown short clips of relevant sections of "Eyes on the Prize" in my Con Law class on Brown v Board and affirmative action/Bakke- not sure it can be streamed but usually your law library will have or can ILL the DVDs- and some "Firing Line" clips of William F Buckley debating the ERA (these are on YouTube), etc.Elizabeth Pleck: Loving v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
” Gravel v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 4:49 am
He would love to. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am
Barbas weaves together a fascinating account of the rise of big media in America and the public’s complex, ongoing love-hate affair with the press. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
So in Myers v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
As it happens, my father was then a partner in a small Whittier law firm that Nixon had been a partner in some two to three decades earlier, before he was elected to Congress. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
In a 2009 speech, he said, “I love my country more than I love politics,” memorably adding: “He deserves my silence. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
” Nixon v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 8:09 am
This story led to an important 1967 Supreme Court decision—Time, Inc. v. [read post]
