Search for: "Lowe v. Medtronic, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2013, 11:37 am by Michelle Yeary
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008) (state law claims that impose requirements “different from or in addition to” FDA’s PMA requirements are preempted). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
Clayton Act limiting partial stock acquisitions for as low as ten (10) per cent of holding of voting stock (Medtronic Inc. 63 Fed. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008) and “impliedly preempted” — “implied preemption” is a code-phrase conservative judicial activists use when they want to pretend Congress tried to stop state tort lawsuits even when it didn’t — under § 337a of the MDA as interpreted by Buckman v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,993,669 entitled LOW POWER CLOCKING SYSTEMS AND METHODS and owned by Intellectual Ventures. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,993,669 entitled LOW POWER CLOCKING SYSTEMS AND METHODS and owned by Intellectual Ventures. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm by Bexis
  Only if we've got a really powerful defense, like preemption in In re Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:01 am
Medtronic, Inc., 128 S.Ct. 999 (2008), holding that the preemption clause of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (21 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 11:49 am
Medtronic, Inc., 128 S.Ct. 999, 1008 (2008). [read post]