Search for: "Lowe v. Price et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2015, 7:26 am
Michael Romano, et al – United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit – July 27th, 2015) involves the testimony of three appraisal and valuation expert witnesses, specifically of coins. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:40 pm
Apparently Qualcomm then had to comply (though it still appealed the decision), and the investigation of Qualcomm's exclusivity arrangements and predatory pricing further to a complaint by Icera, a once-European semiconductor company acquired by Nvidia (and shut down later).At first sight one may wonder why Qualcomm would be accused of overcharging in one context and of predatory pricing in another, but the two theories can be reconciled: Qualcomm's supra-FRAND royalties… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 2:31 pm
Abaco Operating, LLC, et al., in the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
That issue can arise, as it does in the new case of Armour, et al., v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Citing Monsanto Co. v Scruggs et Al., the court held that the purchaser of a patented technologies which can replicate itself is not authorised to use replicated copies of it, as this practice 'would eviscerate the rights of the patent holder'. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:47 pm
But this is why I believe that the structural evidence of low barriers to entry, shifting shares, low concentration, etc., are as important as I do. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 5:25 pm
Related Cases: California Net Neutrality Cases - American Cable Association, et al v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:24 am
However, in the RadLAX case, decided as River Road Hotel Partners, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:21 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:15 am
American Superconductor Corporation, et al., No. 11-cv-10582 (D.Mass. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
For those of you who haven't been following the story, here's a brief recap, shamelessly borrowing from William's prior posts: Jones, et al., were investors in mutual funds managed by Harris Associates, an investment adviser. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm
These funds tend to select reorganization deals where controlling shareholders have incentives to keep prices low and the consideration for minority shareholders merger price is believed to be too low. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:19 am
Competition is multi-dimensional: Ex ante v. ex post, price, quality, service, innovation, etc. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In City of Oakland et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In City of Oakland et al. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19] This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20] While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire goal of… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:01 pm
Pride International, Inc., et. al., 113th District Court, Harris County, No. 2011-08672. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
Shelton, et al. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
Shelton, et al. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 11:56 am
Avanci et al. appellate hearing scheduled for yesterday (Monday, August 30). [read post]
