Search for: "Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council"
Results 21 - 40
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2017, 2:43 am
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), which said that the denial of all economic use of a property by a government regulation was a taking under the Fifth Amendment and required just compensation. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992)), and they failed to establish that they suffered a taking under the more general test of Penn Central Trans. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992)), and they failed to establish that they suffered a taking under the more general test of Penn Central Trans. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:15 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992) 505 U.S. 1003, nor have they suffered a taking under Penn Central Transp. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:31 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 5:26 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:28 am
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), to support their claim that they should be able to sell the property or seek compensation from the government. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), which said that the denial of all economic use of a property by a government regulation was a taking under the Fifth Amendment and required just compensation. [read post]
29 May 2017, 4:59 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council—which was decided 25 years ago this spring. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 2:11 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, Wisconsin argues that it is not just lot lines, but “all of a state’s laws,” that shape the denominator. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:22 am
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), the Penn Central v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 11:50 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, the... [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
In 1992, Justice Scalia penned the opinion in Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council in which the Court ruled that regulations which deprive a landowner of “all economically productive or beneficial uses of land” require compensation absent the presence of a “common-law prohibition. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
In 1992, Justice Scalia penned the opinion in Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council in which the Court ruled that regulations which deprive a landowner of “all economically productive or beneficial uses of land” require compensation absent the presence of a “common-law prohibition. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:58 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), Scalia’s majority opinion ruled that a regulation that completely wipes out all economically valuable uses of an owner’s land qualifies as a taking. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:54 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992) Rapanos... [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 5:38 am
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992) that when regulations deny the owner all economically beneficial use of property, the government must pay compensation because it has effectively taken it. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:21 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, the owner must be deprived of “all economically beneficial or productive use” of the property. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:19 am
” Lucas v. [read post]
