Search for: "Lusk v. Case" Results 21 - 37 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2011, 9:57 am by Chip Merlin
  It should be noted that another Texas appellate court held just the opposite in Lusk v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 9:01 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Evid. 412), Lusk (application of Melendez-Diaz), Sweeney (application of Melendez-Diaz), and Baker (Article 62 appeal identification evidence case). [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:59 am by Dwight Sullivan
Evid. 412), Lusk (application of Melendez-Diaz), Fosler (whether Article 134? [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 8:10 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Thursday’s argument is in an Article 62 appeal case, United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:11 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  By my count, six argued cases remain undecided:  Ellerbrock (Mil. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:43 am by Michelle Lindo McCluer
  Bullcoming is the latest in a string of Confrontation Clause cases dating back to the Justice Scalia opinion in Washington v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:49 am by Dwight Sullivan
  Ten argued cases remain undecided:  Eslinger, Ellerbrock, Gaddis, Schuber, Phillips, Lusk, Zarbatany, Fosler, Sweeney, and Martinez. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by Dwight Sullivan
  Ten argued cases remain undecided:  Eslinger, Ellerbrock, Gaddis, Schuber, Phillips, Lusk, Zarbatany, Fosler, Sweeney, and Martinez. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Lusk, No. 11-0166/AF, was argued on 7 April and United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  in Lusk v Weinstein , 2011 NY Slip Op 04742 , Decided on June 7, 2011 , Appellate Division, First Department we see the AD citing an obviously correct principal of law: "a charging lien entered in the underlying action against plaintiff barred her from thereafter asserting a claim for legal malpractice (see Judiciary Law § 475; Wallach v Unger & Stutman, LLP, 48 AD3d 360 [2008]). [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 8:15 am by Dwight Sullivan
  By my count, there are 12 cases that have been argued but not yet decided (Sullivan, Eslinger, Ellerbrock, Gaddis, Schuber, Phillips, Lusk, Hull, Zarbatany, Fosler, Sweeny, Martinez). [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:52 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Lusk is a drug testing report/Confrontation Clause case. [read post]