Search for: "Lux v. Lux"
Results 21 - 40
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
En effet, les propos dénigrants de ce dernier ont véhiculé le stéréotype qu’une pe [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 3:00 pm
. 📷✍️📚Putting a Face to the Game: The Intellectual Property Implications of Using Celebrity Likenesses in Videogamesby Yin Harn LeeLecturer in Law, University of SheffieldLouboutin v Van Haren - AG Szpunar’s position on Louboutin’s red sole mark: a shoo-in for a shape markby Luxmi (“Lux”) RajanayagamQueen Mary, University of LondonStella McCartney v IMAX Srl - The protection of the ‘eco-friendly’ Falabella… [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 6:48 am
In Holy Redeemer Health System v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:45 am
This meant that one type of average consumer would view SOULUXE as soul + luxe (indicating luxury).As he put it "this is the type of case where there is no binary answer".Likelihood of confusion? [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:14 am
Moroccanoil, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:24 am
Dhir v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:50 am
Trans-Lux Corp., No. 3:11cv1424 (SRU), 2012 WL 4444820 (D. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm
Trans-Lux Corp., No. 3:11cv1424 (SRU), 2012 WL 4444820 (D. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 5:29 am
One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach (that the law abhors a forfeiture) was the rule. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:28 pm
S. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Chapter Readings· Marbury v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 3:00 am
Smith v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
”Can we do Prestigia Ivy Luxe Capital instead of Prestigia Ivy Luxe Partners then? [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:20 pm
Notes for: --Marbury v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 2:01 am
At least as far as Ireland and Luxembourg, each of which produced a number of plaintiffs in Trezziova v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:36 am
”Can we do Prestigia Ivy Luxe Capital instead of Prestigia Ivy Luxe Partners then? [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
O’Neill v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
Underhill in Kramer v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 11:09 am
” In Kramer v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:23 am
The case is Kramer v. [read post]