Search for: "Lux v. Lux" Results 21 - 40 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
En effet, les propos dénigrants de ce dernier ont véhiculé le stéréotype qu’une pe [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 3:00 pm
. 📷✍️📚Putting a Face to the Game: The Intellectual Property Implications of Using Celebrity Likenesses in Videogamesby Yin Harn LeeLecturer in Law, University of SheffieldLouboutin v Van Haren - AG Szpunar’s position on Louboutin’s red sole mark: a shoo-in for a shape markby Luxmi (“Lux”) RajanayagamQueen Mary, University of LondonStella McCartney v IMAX Srl - The protection of the ‘eco-friendly’ Falabella… [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:45 am
 This meant that one type of average consumer would view SOULUXE as soul + luxe (indicating luxury).As he put it "this is the type of case where there is no binary answer".Likelihood of confusion? [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 5:29 am by SHG
One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach (that the law abhors a forfeiture) was the rule. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:55 am by Ron Coleman
 ”Can we do Prestigia Ivy Luxe Capital instead of Prestigia Ivy Luxe Partners then? [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 2:01 am by Andrew Trask
At least as far as Ireland and Luxembourg, each of which produced a number of plaintiffs in Trezziova v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:36 am by Ron Coleman
 ”Can we do Prestigia Ivy Luxe Capital instead of Prestigia Ivy Luxe Partners then? [read post]