Search for: "M Moore" Results 21 - 40 of 2,191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 7:27 am by Dennis Crouch
Chief Judge Moore agreed: You have to agree that just because a bunch of things are known in the industry [does not make the combination obvious], that would turn obviousness on its head. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
IntroductionNormative legal theory is concerned with the ends and justifications for the law as a whole and for particular legal rules. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 11:01 pm by Josh Blackman
(Speaking of patents, I'm glad Chief Justice Roberts and Chief Judge Kimberly Moore found something productive to work on together, as Judge Pauline Newman remains trapped in Article III purgatory). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
In a new study, we look at dealmakers in law firms, examining the individual characteristics that distinguish those who lead M&A deals. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by John Elwood
Tune in next week when I’m proven wrong. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
 This post and the next are follow-ups to my collection of posts on Trump v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm
"I'm confident that there are many appellate judges (both state and federal), in California and elsewhere, who would have found these interactions entirely consensual, even today.But I also think there's an increasing number who would agree with Justice Moor. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Yosi Yahoudai
According to research from Texas A&M, pigs are the most prolific large mammals on earth. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:30 am by Gritsforbreakfast
They're voting for or against José Garza.Still, there are too many silly/silver puns and wordplay options available; I need a mnemonic to remind me of this guy's name, and I'm betting you do, too. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:28 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“The winds were, I’m telling you, gusts 50, 60 miles an hour. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
"[I]n Gorsuch's words, he would be required to undermine the very notion of income taxation 'if I'm not willing to overturn a hundred years' worth of precedent.' Right. [read post]