Search for: "M v. M" Results 21 - 40 of 54,592
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
It is arguably a necessary power in order to meet the contingencies that arise over time.In the leading American case, Jackson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:54 pm
"One defense the defendant has is that an electrician should make sure that a wire isn't live every single time by testing it before he touches it, and I'm certain that's true.But the junction box was labeled as 120-volt, had wires color-coded as 120-volt, and was supposed to be separate (under the building code) from the 277-volt system, yet none of that was true. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:36 am by Francis Pileggi
M & F Worldwide Corp. 88 A.3d 635 (Del. 2014) demands of controller-dominated deals to qualify for review under the defendant-friendly business judgment standard. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 11:26 am by Dennis Crouch
Talk about LKQ: I’m looking forward to joining Prof Sarah Burstein and others on Tuesday June 4 for an online panel discussion on the potential aftermath of the Federal Circuit’s major en banc design patent obviousness decision in LKQ v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Lombardi, Reynolds Revisited: The Original Meaning of Reynolds v. [read post]