Search for: "M.R. v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 2:46 am
M.R. v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:22 am
M.R., a case involving the “stay put”provision of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 12:00 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:03 pm
But Olmstead has been successfully used to keep DSHS from reducing the types of in-home personal care services offered under Washington’s Medicaid plan (see M.R. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:28 am
Supreme Court Case Padilla v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:32 pm
§ 71 (Count V), bias (Count VI), violations of Maine Rule of Civil Procedure 80B and 30–A M.R. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:58 am
M.R. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
Camp, M.R. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
The SJC's request for amicus briefs states: "The issue presented is whether the mortgagee's affidavit containing a conclusory statement of compliance with G.L. c. 244, § 14, states sufficient facts to comply with the notice requirements included within the statutory power of sale set forth in that statute; to comply with M.R. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:20 pm
State, 825 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Smith v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:59 am
While considering the request in the given case, Chief Election Commissioner of India v M.R. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 9:00 am
In Mladen Estate v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
In Kilby et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
M.R., for Education Week’s School Law Blog, as well as the cert. denial in a lawsuit brought by thousands of New Orleans teachers who were fired after Hurricane Katrina. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:16 pm
This was subject to SCR 1961, M.R. 370s which effectively excluded the use of discovery of a former officer or servant who had been dismissed from employment except where such dismissal occurred after service of the appointment for examination for discovery, in which case his examination could be used with leave of the court: Seymour v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Marin v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:31 am
The denial of review in O’Keefe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
At [34] the CA stated the general rule in future. [read post]
