Search for: "M.T. V. STATE"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2012, 10:50 am
Florida and Maples v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:12 pm
In Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom the government boldly sought and failed to reverse the decision of the court’s Grand Chamber in Hirst No. 2. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:01 am
In Rink v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:23 am
The UK had attempted to appeal the recent decision in Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm
A-S v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 564 (Admin) (17 January 2011): Bizarre “catch-22? [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Council of Europe, which monitors compliance with European Court of Human Rights judgments, eventually (in November 2010) warned the UK via the case of Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom that if it does not implement the judgment, it would face thousands of financial claims against it potentially totalling millions of pounds. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:25 pm
IN, CASE OF GREENS and M.T. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
It is wishful thinking, therefore, to argue, as Stewart Jackson (Peterborough) (Con) does, that: Is not it true that the recent case of Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom specifically allows the Government to proceed with a range of policy options, which, like the consultation in 2009, could be put out for public discussion? [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:35 am
M.T. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
Updated | Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom (application nos. 60041/08 & 60054/08) – Read judgment / press release (which the case summary below is based on) The European Court of Human Rights is to give the UK a deadline of six months in order to allow prisoners to vote in elections, or it could face significant consequences. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:01 am
M.T. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
In M.T. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 12:29 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
One-Year Limit Period to Challenge Sentence Not Tolled Pending Application for Counsel
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:00 pm
The majority in M.T. for A.T. v. [read post]
