Search for: "MARRIAGE OF A R C"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,561
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2023, 8:03 am
” In re Marriage of Wycoff, 266 Ill. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged without the state to be… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Seth C. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm
”(C) Service by Text Message. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 5:12 pm
” In his dissent, council member Bintan R. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:31 am
” In re Marriage of Isaacs, 260 Ill. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:20 pm
In R. c. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
"The 100-page “family code” legalises same-sex marriage and civil unions, allows same-sex couples to adopt children, and promotes equal sharing of domestic rights and responsibilities between men and women. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:11 pm
R. 11(c) The second requirement “that respondent had a meritorious defense to the order” is dependent on the facts. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm
R. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 8:05 am
§ 2265(c) Federal law is the supreme law of the United States, so competing orders of protection must be filed in the original state as a counter-petition in order for a subsequent out-of-state order of protection to be honored. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
Islam Uddin, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion: Muslim Women, Nikah Marriages, Domestic Abuse and Religious Arbitration in England. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
R. 323(c) An interested party cannot provide a record of their own version of events. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:17 pm
R. 219(c)(vi) Stay on top of your Illinois divorce case! [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Smith might never get her website up and running, or that (b) same-sex couples would never actually request her services, or that (c) she would discourage—strongly—said couples, but not actually refuse them service. 1. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:48 am
”(C) Service by Text Message. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
R. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:52 am
On June 22, 2023, Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Thom Tillis (R-NC) introduced the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023, which seeks to clarify the jurisprudence surrounding 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:54 pm
” In re Marriage of Hellwig (1981), 100 Ill. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 8:04 am
R. [read post]
