Search for: "MARRIAGE OF COLE" Results 21 - 40 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2020, 7:45 am by Brian Greer
” As Cole explained, this focus distracted from a discussion over legality, morality and shared responsibility. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Sam Muller
The new Ècole de Formation Judiciare is working on a curriculum for a better kind of justice provider. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am by Kollias & Giese, P.C.
  In In re Marriage of Carstens, the 2nd District Appellate Court distinguished its decision from Cole by looking at the date of filing of the appellant’s underlying Petition to Modify Maintenance. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 11:14 am by Amy Howe
He reminded the court that in its decision affirming the right to same-sex marriage, the majority acknowledged that “good and decent people” may object to same-sex marriage on religious grounds. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Student Presenters: Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu)The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (Lauren.feldman@jhu.edu)Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York’s Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu)Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise and Regulation of Bank Holding Companies in the Twentieth… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal 2020 Democrats Vow to Get Tough on Lobbyists The Hill – Alex Gangitano | Published: 7/7/2019 Democratic presidential hopefuls are taking aim at the lobbying world, vowing to enact sweeping reform proposals if they win election. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
  Tor Butler-Cole QC pointed out in response to Thangam Debbonaire’s tweets This contains a summary of the law the judge will be applying – https://t.co/YoupLmxm4m — Tor Butler-Cole (@TorButlerCole) April 2, 2019 The Court of Protection makes decisions about capacity to consent to sex on a fairly frequent basis. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:00 am by Rania Combs
Timothy Cole was abandoned by his father when he was seven years old and raised by his mother. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 12:13 am by Steve Lubet
” This led to a conversation that, after thirty years of marriage, I had never imagined having with my wife. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 12:37 pm by umbrella
The Child Support Provision Paragraphs 10 and 11 of the marriage contract required the ex-husband (David) to pay child support to the ex-wife (Christine) for support of the two children (Tristyn and Cole). [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 12:37 pm by umbrella
The Child Support Provision Paragraphs 10 and 11 of the marriage contract required the ex-husband (David) to pay child support to the ex-wife (Christine) for support of the two children (Tristyn and Cole). [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
 As a matter of policy, the ACLU, of which David Cole is the National Legal Director, neither endorses nor opposes Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am by Colby Pastre
Key Findings In December 2017, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), arguably the most significant piece of tax legislation in three decades. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:59 pm by Kathy Kapusta
The law goes a bit further than other state laws of its genre ostensibly to protect from “discriminatory action” by the government religious organizations and individuals who refuse to solemnize, celebrate, recognize, accommodate, or provide goods or services for a same-sex marriage or to same-sex-oriented individuals because of a sincerely held religious belief, or even a moral conviction, that marriage should be limited to the union of one man and one woman and sexual… [read post]