Search for: "MARYLAND NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. v. DISTRICT COURT" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am by Lorene Park
The district court ruled that the third ban, like its predecessors, “plainly discriminates based on nationality” in violation of the Immigration and Naturalization Act. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In 1972, the Court went further and found in Eisenstadt v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
District Court for the District of Maryland:  Khan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company,[3] the Maryland district court held that when a law firm reimburses a customer trust account for which one of the law firm’s partners was the trustee, such loss would be considered a loss under both the “Direct means Direct” and “Proximate Cause” opinions. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am by Stephen Wermiel
A few weeks earlier, he read parts of his dissent in the case of Maryland v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
In The New Republic, Simon Lazarus reports on a challenge to the federal government’s power to create health-insurance exchanges under the Affordable Care Act, currently pending before a federal district court in Washington, D.C., which might give the Supreme Court “another chance to gut Obamacare. [read post]