Search for: "MATTER OF C A D III" Results 21 - 40 of 2,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
For the same reason, the deletion of the last half sentence of part (d) in auxiliary requests I and III should have no consequences under the provisions of A 123(3). [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
P. 11(c)(1)(C) stipulated sentence because it did not allow a judge to judge. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 2:45 pm by Matt McCormick
The long-awaited filing window for certain Class C and D AM stations to apply for new FM translators will open at 12:01 a.m. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 9:43 am by Immigration Lawyer Peter Messersmith
No matter which US government agency made the inadmissibility determination, each provides a method to dispute the determination, though each has drastically different processing times. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 10:36 am by Immigration Lawyer Peter Messersmith
No matter which US government agency made the inadmissibility determination, each provides a method to dispute the determination, though each has drastically different processing times. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 3:49 pm
(o) for the passing of accounts,(p) fixing and approving the remuneration of a personal representative, or(q) subject to subrule (2), respecting any other matter concerning(i)   an authorization to obtain estate information,(ii)   an authorization to obtain resealing information,(iii)   a grant of probate,(iv)   a grant of administration with or without will annexed,(v)   an ancillary grant,(vi)   a resealing, or(vii)   the office of personal… [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 6:15 pm by Public Employment Law Press
(c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters. [read post]
  Thus, the Ninth Circuit concluded that retroactive overtime payments were not an hourly rate “in effect” during the MyShare pay periods for purposes of § 226(a)(9). c) District Court’s Rationale In Finding Walmart Had Violated Labor Code § 226(a)(6). [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  OPR is obviously correct that subdivisions (c) and (d) were intended to work together, and that (c) was not intended to contradict and preempt the agreement mechanism provided in (d). [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm by Ailyn Cabico
  Proposed Amendments to Regulation D, Form D and Rule 156 In connection with the approval of Rule 506(c), the SEC proposed amendments to Regulation D, Form D and Rule 156 under the Securities Act. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
So, for example, separate extensions commonly exist for matters such as extradition, corporate manslaughter and pollution. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 8:31 am by Lisa Ouellette
(Note that it doesn't matter whether IFN is included as a cost for false negatives or a benefit for true positives; you get to the same result.) [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
  Now, there are a total of 4 winning coalitions: (A+B+C+D), (A+B+C), (A+B+D), and (A+C+D) and Shareholder A can change the result in all four of these coalitions. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
Howell, III, argue that Congress should repeal section 1447(d) and permit unrestricted review of remand orders.What's our reaction to this? [read post]