Search for: "MATTER OF D R B" Results 21 - 40 of 5,961
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2024, 1:40 am by Nina Ferara (Porsche AG)
The old EQE was much more rigid in that sense: papers A, B, C and D had the same underlying tasks each year. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:00 am by Bret Cahn
In Matter of Loftman (Mae R.), the Supreme Court did not revoke the advanced directives (Matter of Loftman (Mae R.), 123 AD3d 1034 [2nd Dept. 2014]). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Trump, supra, 928 F. 3d at 236, focusing on whether the social media site functions as a “tool of governance” “swathe[d] in the trappings of [the official’s] office,” see, Davison v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
" (This strikes me as a weak argument because in matters of diplomatic relations, the executive branch is the relevant authority.) b) Her intent was to influence Syria's conduct with respect to Israel, not the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
One Tenth Circuit judge has already held that Fourth Corner Credit Union (Fourth Corner), which was legally eligible for a master account and proposed to provide payment services to marijuana businesses, was entitled to a master account as a matter of law. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am by Virginia Canter
Angie Craig (D-MN) and Nancy Mace (R-SC) that would strengthen the definition of “official act. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm by Brian Clark
Code Section 197 allows ratable 15-year amortization for any “amortizable section 197 intangible”.[24] Purchased intangible assets are typically considered “section 197 intangibles” (and therefore mainly “amortizable section 197 intangibles”) while self-created (developed) IP is often – though not exclusively – ineligible for § 197 amortization.[25] Both (i) self-created intangibles described in § 197(d)(1)(D), (E), and (F)… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
Comm’r of Labor (In re Lowry), 189 A.D.3d 1863, 138 N.Y.S.3d 238 (N.Y. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) released a Proposed Statement of Policy on Bank Merger Transactions (the Proposal) that outlines the FDIC’s views on its jurisdiction and expectations with respect to each statutory factor under the Bank Merger Act (BMA). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Plaintiff further alleges these services included “Gray providing Plaintiff direction and advice on numerous legal questions and matters related to the production of the Film and Plaintiffs control over it” (id., ,r 102). [read post]