Search for: "MATTER OF D T H" Results 21 - 40 of 2,379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2007, 4:46 am
Let's just say we shan't be flying Spirit Airlines again, no matter how low their fares. h/t: Feminist Law Professors See ABC news. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:27 am by Raymond Wee Hock Tan
Not much time for parents to care for 9thchild.wǒ zài xīn jiā pō zhǎnɡdà ,shì yì jiā 10kǒu de dì 9 ɡè hái zi 。wǒde fùqīn kāi chūzūchē,mǔqīn shì cáifénɡ。Suīrán jiā tínɡ tiáo jiàn bú tài hǎo… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 7:39 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
OFLC will deny H-2B applications requesting an April 1, 2024, work start date if filed before January 2, 2024, at 12:00 a.m. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:48 am by Carl Shusterman
So, if Congress provides relief to beneficiaries “because of the length of the visa line” in Section 2 and 6 of CSPA, why can’t they do the same in Section 3? [read post]
14 May 2009, 12:35 am
According to Connie Wilhite, the EEOC lawyer in charge of the case, "It doesn't matter what industry you work in. [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:13 am by Rose Hughes
 T 1989/18 and T 1024/18 by contrast relate to the legal basis for deletion of contradictory subject matter. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:50 pm by Mary
DEADLINE to submit comments (informal, individuals, associations, formal, any) is MAY 2 DRAFT N J L A L E T T E R H E A D Federal Trade Commission Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D) 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20580 Re: Google Buzz, File No.1023136 To the FTC: The New Jersey Library Association submits this comment on the proposed consent order, In the Matter of Google Inc., File No. 1023136, between the FTC… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:56 am by S & F Media LLC.
This means that either party may file for a divorce without proving any grounds other than the spouses don't want to be married anymore. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
-amylase according (a-d) wherein the ? [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
If what is meant is (as understood by the ED in the present case) that there is no modification whatsoever of any other feature of the embodiment, than the condition is trivial and almost never fulfilled (for instance, when a different water level sensor is used […]).[2.9] Therefore, contrary to the opinion of the ED (and of the [applicant]), the Board considers the “three point or essentiality test” (cf. the Guidelines H-V 3.1 and H-V 3.2.1 (June 2012 edition))… [read post]