Search for: "MATTER OF H W"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,557
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm
[4] The other method is treating partners or members as employees, providing them a W-2, and flowing the balance of profits through as income that is not subject to SECA Tax. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:49 am
See, Ma J, Gu J, Jia H, Yao Z, Chang R. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
Contra Shugerman, it does not matter if Congress authorized ad [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 12:04 pm
Issued in October 2023, Executive Order 14,110, Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence, observed that “[h]arnessing AI for good and realizing its myriad benefits requires mitigating its substantial risks. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:18 am
W. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
District Court Judge William H. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The former president had not forgotten how Brandeis had humiliated him and his attorney general, George W. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
This post and the next are follow-ups to my collection of posts on Trump v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 8:33 am
” Gregory H. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
“[W]hether the court will be able to fashion a reasonable allocation of parental responsibilities between all parents if the relocation occurs. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:20 am
However, the court rejected this argument, stating that the statute in question, § 19-509(h)(1), explicitly refers to policies different in kind from primary policies. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am
However, the DoD Manual stops short of embracing any of these possibilities as a matter of binding law, and instead opts for a more pragmatic, discretionary approach. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1] [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words on… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[24] The court continued by observing that: [H]ere, the Provision is used by an agency of the federal government to shield itself from public view. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
It is then a matter of describing those rights to give them form. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:05 am
W. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
" On the day that the Court's decision dropped, the President sent another letter lamenting the "difficult day" that "[w]e" "see" "as a step backwards. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:13 am
Doesn’t matter. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Robert H. [read post]
