Search for: "MATTER OF INTERNAL OPERATING RULE 1"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2017, 12:27 pm
”International rules governing which works, performances, phonograms and broadcasts are protected tend to be complicated, and this attempt to regulate them all in a joint provision seems to add analytical complexity, rather than simplify things.Let us first recall the multilateral “interface” to which these rules should fit: under Article 5(1) of the Berne Convention, the obligations to grant national treatment and minimum rights under the… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
As a preliminary matter, the Court rejected the DOL’s 6-factor test, ruling that the agency’s test is “too rigid” and that it is not entitled to “special competence or role in interpreting” the Portland Terminal decision. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 12:53 pm
Espionage, as such, violates no rule of international law. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
Supreme Court to Rule on Important International Arbitration Issue, I wrote about an important international arbitration matter pending before the United States Supreme Court on whether foreign companies doing business in the United States can arbitrate a dispute with an American company. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
As a preliminary matter, the Court rejected the DOL’s 6-factor test, ruling that the agency’s test is “too rigid” and that it is not entitled to “special competence or role in interpreting” the Portland Terminal decision. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:26 am
Specific responsibilities will include:1. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:11 pm
Related posts: German Federal Labour Court Rules on Jurisdiction in Posted Workers Case German Federal Supreme Court affirms Jurisdiction based on Art. 5 Nr. 1 Brussels Convention with regard to Claims based on Prize Notifications German Federal Supreme Court: Contest of Local Jurisdiction Implies Contest of International Jurisdiction [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
Will this matter much in practice? [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 11:02 am
The Appeals Chamber ruled as a preliminary matter that an admissibility determination was not a pre-requisite to the issuance of an arrest warrant. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 1:45 pm
Seyfarth Synopsis: In a unanimous decision, the California Supreme Court held that the worker friendly “ABC” test set forth by the Court in its 2018 landmark ruling, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTE [1] In re Caremark Int’l Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 1:57 pm
” The compliance date would be extended from July 1, 2017, to Dec. 1, 2017 to allow OSHA to further review and consider its final rule the Obama Administration previously published on May 12, 2016. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:13 pm
Any statements contained herein are not intended or written by the writer to be used, and nothing contained herein can be used by you or any other person, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties that may be imposed under federal tax law, or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related transaction or matter addressed herein. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:07 am
The company’s CFO allegedly misappropriated over $1 million from an account that was to be used to fund the company’s search for a suitable acquisition target. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 7:10 am
Are you operating in foreign jurisdictions where the ability to enforce rights over intellectual property is limited as a statutory or practical matter? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 1:25 pm
Recently, on June 1, the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published its long anticipated Medicaid managed care proposed rules. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 7:32 am
Department of Defense recently announced a nearly $1 billion deal to counter misinformation (without sharing much about what that entails). [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:24 am
Rina SpA, Ente Registro Italiano Navale, on the concepts of ‘civil and commercial matters’ and ‘administrative matters’ under Article 1 Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm
For now, however, DoD largely sticks to accepted international law. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 6:36 am
It should be observed that, while the CJEU has already rule on matters of international jurisdiction relating to online infringements of national trade marks (Wintersteiger) and offline infringements of EU trade marks (Coty), the Court had not been given the chance - until AMS Neve - to rule on international jurisdiction in online EU trade mark infringement cases. [read post]
