Search for: "MATTER OF J J G"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,331
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm
G 5/83 [2-5]; G 1/07 [3.1]; G 2/08 [4]). [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 8:56 pm
Lin, Karl Lindstrom, Lori Locascio, Bruce G. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:04 am
The court terminated respondent-mother’s parental rights to all four children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(i), (g), (j), and (k)(iii), and terminated respondent-father’s parental rights to his three children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(ii), (g), and (j). [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
After G 1/09 had issued, there was quite some speculation on whether its verdict could be transferred to the case of deemed withdrawal. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:43 pm
The lectures of Mario J. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
In later decisions J 24/96 [2] and T 1382/08 [1.1], however, the question is discussed in detail and answered by stating that the allocation pursuant to A 21(3)(c) unambiguously provides that the LBA is competent. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 6:04 am
Shiel G. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 2:17 pm
SUNDHEIM, JEFFREY J. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:11 am
Contents include:William J. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:02 am
Blaine Bookey, Gender-Based Asylum Post-Matter of A-R-C-G: Evolving Standards and Fair Application of the Law, 22 Southwestern J. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am
In other words, the reimbursement of a fee requires there to be special provision (see for example decision J 33/86). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:43 pm
J. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:45 am
Whereas all these applications were successfully entered into the appellant's docketing system IPENDO, the European application in question was "inadvertently, inexplicably and unintentionally" not uploaded into this system.Concerning IPENDO it was submitted that this system, which served both as a docketing reminder system and an annuity payment service, contained a comprehensive storehouse of information regarding the appellant's pending intellectual property matters,… [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
How did the Legal Board decide this matter? [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 11:20 am
Attorneys and co-hosts Bob Ambrogi and J. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 2:21 pm
J is for Joint Accounts Joint accounts often appear convenient but can be a real headache when it comes to taxes. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 9:21 pm
JOHN G. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:28 pm
J. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:18 pm
And because all debtors have an absolute duty to disclose matters truthfully, let's just say that it wouldn't look too good at that point! [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
In this regard the Board points out that this wording of R 36(1) EPC is identical to the wording of the former R 25(1) EPC 1973 and, therefore, the corresponding case law can be taken into account.[6] The present Board agrees with the statement of the Legal Board of Appeal in decision J 18/04 that the term “pending earlier European patent application” in R 25 EPC 1973 did not establish a time limit having a point in time at which the pending status of an application begins and… [read post]
