Search for: "MATTER OF J K C"
Results 21 - 40
of 911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2012, 8:30 am
Findley and Joseph K. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
In this regard the Board points out that this wording of R 36(1) EPC is identical to the wording of the former R 25(1) EPC 1973 and, therefore, the corresponding case law can be taken into account.[6] The present Board agrees with the statement of the Legal Board of Appeal in decision J 18/04 that the term “pending earlier European patent application” in R 25 EPC 1973 did not establish a time limit having a point in time at which the pending status of an application begins and… [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 11:56 am
Carey, Pamela Bloch, and Richard K. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Further rules concerning this matter are found in the Decision of the President of the EPO dated 28 April 2011 on the filing of sequence listings (OJ EPO 2011, 372) which has entered into force on June 1, 2011 and which, according to its Article 8, applies to all European patent applications pending on that date. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am
But it’s not responsible to model instructional practices that can be used by some learners like college students and not by others like K-12. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 8:56 pm
Lundie, Darrin Lyon, Hollie K. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:43 pm
The lectures of Mario J. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 7:20 am
Thomas J. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:56 am
Revised Items 402(c)(2), 402(d), 402(k), 402(n), Reg. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:59 am
Germanotta p/k/a Lady Gaga, No. 11 C 5270, Slip Op. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 4:53 am
I didn’t have to wait long : Holman J has done it in London Borough of Brent v C [2016] EWHC 1335 (Fam) (28 April 2016). [read post]
23 May 2007, 3:02 am
That’s the topic that John K. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm
WARD and LaLONNIE WARD; JANNY KINION-MAY; C LAZY J RANCH; CHARLES BUMGARNER and KARLA BUMGARNER; CARL W. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, A 84 (EPC 1973) together with R 29 (EPC 1973) requires a claim to give all the essential features that are necessary for defining the invention.This requirements has also been affirmed in decision G 1/07 [4.2.2; 3.3.1 – should read 4.3.1]. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:37 pm
Tax Matters. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
A method of analyzing a DNA sample that contains genetic material from at least two individuals to determine a probability distribution of genotype likelihood or weight in the sample, comprising the steps: (a) amplifying the DNA sample to produce an amplification product comprising DNA fragments, wherein each allele at a locus is amplified to generate relative amounts of DNA fragments of the alleles that are proportional to the relative amounts of template DNA from the alleles in the DNA sample, and… [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 10:33 am
Thomale, K. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
See Holmes, J., dissenting and joined by Brandeis, J., in Abrams v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:16 am
ALITO, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:30 am
Maloney, Brandon J. [read post]
